🗓️ Lecture 04: Logic, argumentation, models, and explanation

Author

Anna-Katharina Kothe

Published

19 10 2026

Modified

20 10 2026

Rescheduled session. This lecture was originally scheduled for 5 October 2026 and had to be cancelled; it took place on 19 October 2026 instead. All later lectures moved by one week as well — see the lecture overview.

Take-home examination I on logic and argumentation belongs to this lecture. It is published on Moodle on 21 October 2026 and must be submitted there by 4 November 2026, 23:59.

🎯 Content and goals

On logic, argumentation, and models:

  • You know different types of arguments, most importantly deductive and inductive arguments and the most common argumentative fallacies.
  • You can evaluate an argument and know the difference between the concepts of validity and truth.
  • You can analyze arguments through reconstruction.

On scientific arguments, models, and explanation:

  • You understand the concepts of a theory, a model, and an explanation, as well as the deductive-nomological model.
  • You know about the structure of scientific progress and scientific paradigms.
  • You understand the concepts of ontology, epistemology, and methodology.

🖥️ Lecture Slides

Download the slides (PDF)

📚 Mandatory Reading

🏆 Further Readings

On logic, argumentation, and models:

On scientific arguments, models, and explanation:

✍️ Exercises and coursework

Take-home examination (pass/fail; you must pass two of the three take-home examinations to be admitted to the final exam — see the seminar description):

  • Take-home examination on Logic & Argumentation, published after this lecture via Moodle.

If you have questions or problems, please post them in the Moodle forum.

References

Hansson, S. O. (2021) “Science and Pseudo-Science,” in E. N. Zalta and U. Nodelman (eds.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/pseudo-science/ (accessed June 2026).
Hundleby, C. E. (2023) “Feminist Perspectives on Argumentation,” in E. N. Zalta and U. Nodelman (eds.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/feminism-argumentation/ (accessed June 2026).
Lutz, B., Pröllochs, N. and Neumann, D. (2022) “Are longer reviews always more helpful? Disentangling the interplay between review length and line of argumentation,” Journal of Business Research 144: 888–901.
Popper, K. R. (2007) Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge, Routledge.
Reiss, J. (2013) Philosophy of economics: A contemporary introduction, New York: Routledge.
Shrader-Frechette, K. (2014) Tainted: How philosophy of science can expose bad science, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.